Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 09 Feb 2026, 11:33 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2026, 11:33 pm

 "rape" was not what informed the request for damages. Damages were sought specifically for "Defamation" and "Sexual Battery"

brown, did the verdict or the opinion determine damages? did the court " require a jury to return only a special verdict"? and if so, what was it specifically?

so what's your **** point?

it looks as "rape" does not come into play in the jury's verdict nor does it come into play for determining damages...

the judge's opinion looks as if he's trying to make it something it isn't...

 

brown, did the verdict or the opinion determine damages?

The Verdict.

The "opinion" addressed WHY the jury awarded 2 million.

did the court " require a jury to return only a special verdict"?

The "special verdict" was at request of and by agreement of both parties.

It was not required by the court.

and if so, what was it specifically?

A "finding"

so what's your **** point?

That you're a **** idiot. 

Duh.

it looks as "rape" does not come into play in the jury's nor does it come into play for determining damages...

Why did it award 2 million?

Why did Team Grifty petition for a reduction?

why did Judge Kaplan uphold the award?

Damn, are you a stupid **** human.

the judge's opinion looks as if he's trying to make it something it isn't...

How much of it have you read, JuCo?