User avatar
Blackvegetable
11 Feb 2026 9:29 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
53,876 posts
ROG62 » 11 Feb 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: did the jury's award for damages include a statement that the amount awarded, was due to actual rape and not for "defamation and sexual battery"?

because if not, you, along with Kaplan are just holding your dicks and pissing in the wind...

of course they would contest it...what lawyers don't?

 It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump...of course he upheld it...

Damn, are you a stupid **** human.
did the jury's award for damages include a statement that the amount awarded, was due to actual rape and not for "defamation and sexual battery"?
there was one amount for defamation and a second for sexual.assault.
because if not, 
resolved.
of course they would contest it...what lawyers don't?
because it is not at their discretion....it is at the client's. 

You really don't have any idea how this **** works, do you...
It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump...
where?



And don't pull another JuCo, JuCo. 
Damn, are you a stupid **** human.
 Your "if/not" failed....you dropped your micropeepee....
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search