Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 13 Feb 2026, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2026, 3:09 pm

I didn't run from ****, clinger...

you've already admitted the jury "DID NOT"  find him guilty of rape...

you posted the **** about "criminal vs civil" and then stuck both feet in your mouth up to your *** by posting (in rebuttal    ,  the following...
Damages were sought specifically for "Defamation" and "Sexual Battery"

 "rape" was not listed in the request for damages. ...

truly now, ****...you've officially beaten your own *** to a bloody pulp...

you've already admitted the jury "DID NOT"  find him guilty of rape...

but that's not the verdict.

It was a finding.

you posted the **** about "criminal vs civil"

What was "****"?

Damages were sought specifically for "Defamation" and "Sexual Battery"

 Factually correct.

 

 "rape" was not listed in the request for damages. ...

That is also correct.

The possibility of rape - as defined by NY statute - was mentioned in the complaint, as Carroll was unsure whether Grafty penetrated her with his small hand or tiny pens.

truly now, ****...you've officially beaten your own *** to a bloody pulp...

why was Kaplan obliged to opine?