Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑
They have absolutely nothing to do with the reason the AR15 was designed and developed.
You should read the citation, "armorer".
You have no idea what an assault rifle is, or why.
We have already been over this. You lost. You refuse to specify which weapon you are discussing. The Armalite Rifle 15 which became the Colt c601 and designated the M 16 was a weapon designed for the battlefield. The ATF classifies it a class 3 NFA weapon as a machine gun. You have the Certification Letter.
The Colt SP1 AR 15 was specifically designed for civilians use and marketed as a hunting rifle. You have one of the marketing ads. It was no more dangerous than any other semi automatic weapon.
NOte the date and time stamp. That is NOT the first time I have told you.
Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑
We have already been over this. You lost. You refuse to specify which weapon you are discussing.
The Armalite Rifle 15 which became the Colt c601 and designated the M 16 was a weapon designed for the battlefield. The ATF classifies it a class 3 NFA weapon as a machine gun. You have the Certification Letter.
The Colt SP1 AR 15 was specifically designed for civilians use and marketed as a hunting rifle. You have one of the marketing ads. It was no more dangerous than any other semi automatic weapon.
Stop with the narrative.
shut the **** up and read.
https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/exhibit ... -violence/
I told you using strike thru was gonna bit you in the ***.
Now bring some new facty thingies and a narrative point.
Only in the retelling of the retelling.
That's a lie. As I have told you.