User avatar
Huey
16 Jun 2022 8:32 am
User avatar
      
37,293 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Jun 2022, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 16 Jun 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ Which lower receiver represents the AR 15 under discussion?  Those are lowers are from two different types of weapons.
There is only 1 AR 15 design.

Are you asking about variants OTHER than that used in the Uvalde shooting?

 
Sorry, this is about what the AR 15 was designed to do.  The weapon used in Ulvalde was a DDM4 7 series.  
Blackvegetable » 16 Jun 2022, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 16 Jun 2022, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ No, answer the question about the lowers.  THAT resolves the issue.

]If you can't tell me the differences in the two lowers and why it is important you are not qualified to decide who won or lost.  You have no knowledge on the topic. 

But you go ahead and support a ban on something because it looks mean and scary that will not change anything.
No.

Because it is irrelevant. 

This is about what an AR 15 INDISPUTABLY was designed to do.

It has no civilian purpose.

It has NEVER been designed for a civilian purpose. Even the .223.

The rifle used in Uvalde is "loaded" with "military spec" parts. 

Why are parts made to military standards produced for varmint shooting?

They aren't. 



 

 
Your words:

This is about what an AR 15 INDISPUTABLY was designed to do.
 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search