User avatar
Huey
16 Jun 2022 11:37 am
User avatar
      
37,293 posts
FOS » 16 Jun 2022, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 16 Jun 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ Do I really need to explain it to him/her or should I let it go?

explain it to him. lets go, boy. the founding fathers clearly had no idea of how much warfare would change after ww1. EVERYONE was surprised by that. 

are you gonna tell us that if george washington knew of the future of mechanized warfare it would have NO impact on his philosophy?

if he knew about the future of demographics, it would have NO impact on his philosophy?

those are pretty baseless assumptions.

But then again, im making assumptions about your analysis of this situation, and IM guessing your real thoughts are even stupider than my own. 

explain it.

 
I want to understand your position.  The OP is insinuating since the only firearm they were aware of was a musket/flintlock type the framers could not fathom any other type of weapon.  We are not talking mechanized warfare.  We are talking about firearms. I don;t give a rat's *** about what you are ranting about. 

Do you agree?  

If so, let's go.  This is gonna be fun!
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search