Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
51,103 posts
*Roshambo » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
This represents budget funding that follows the principle of "use it or lose it." Nothing further. While the Pentagon does not technically have to spend all its congressionally allocated funds, “use-it-or-lose-it” policies often push it to do so. Any leftover funds could be removed from the budget the following year.
The tariffs are a "flop" and now this. So much for DOGE and cost savings.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/pet ... 51608.html
Trump aides struggle with how to spend $500 billion more on military
The White House budget chief was among those who internally objected to the defense secretary’s plan to increase military spending by roughly 50 percent, people familiar with the matter said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... -military/