Zeets2 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I'm waiting for you to show me even a scrap of evidence that the US hit that school with a missile INTENTIONALLY!
Never said they did, stupid.
But you said if they did, the Geneva Conventions allow it.
You're an idiot.
Zeets2 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Yet you continually post as if it's a fact that they did, and that is a bald-faced **** lie, scumbag!
I have taken no such opinion. You're just stupid.
Zeets2 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
How many times do I have to repeat that the Geneva Convention rules DO NOT APPLY because the school WAS A LEGITIMATE TARGET!
You repeated that retarded **** enough, fruity pebbles.
Zeets2 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
And NOBODY has EVER said that deliberately doing so WAS permissible, AND WE'VE NEVER DONE SO!
Nobody except you, ya mean.
You - when you said that you were good either way, in response to me saying EITHER they targeted it, OR they lagged behind Google Earth in their intel.
You said either of those were fine with you - and then you said the Geneva Conventions allow the targeting of a school.
It's all right there in black and white, fruitcake.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?