User avatar
Cannonpointer
Today 4:17 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
44,206 posts
Vegas » 19 minutes ago » wrote: Some things I agree with Shapiro and Kirk, and some things I don't. However, you are right. They made a fortune off picking low hanging fruit. Debating naive college students? Seriously? Kirk was confronted a few times about that. His response was even more pathetic and a clear cop out. He said that we are two voters trying to discuss issues. That is productive. That moron. He could have debated very well respected and highly intelligent philosophers, atheists, or well known academic researchers who are also voters in America. They have a much longer reach to the other voters in America, so it would be more effective. But they are not easy prey. So he didn't go up against them.
I feel differently about Kirk. He never shamed people. He gave people outs. He genuinely tried to convince young people of his positions. Shapiro isn't doing that - he's going for the kill. Kirk tried for synthesis. He tried to find as many points of agreement as possible, and when he couldnot bring someone over, he would respectfully agree to disagree. 

Kirk was on a mission to change the country be getting the youth on board his agenda, Shapiro's just chasing dollars. 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search