How soon will we hear Trump's play on words and reframing about the war? Post #767340 • Liberal Forum

DeezerShoove » 30 Mar 2026, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑
30 Mar 2026, 10:31 pm
So the thinking is: You'd rather wait for them to have the bomb?

Ya gotta give us a number between 5 and 100.

How many times do we kill off all of their scientists and bomb all of their production facilities and utterly destroy their capacity to make a nuclear bomb before we have to stop killing off all of their scientists and bombing all of their production facilities and utterly destroying their capacity to make a nuclear bomb?

Your, "We can't let em get the bomb" narrative made SOME sense in 1988. Less in 1998. Even less in 2008. And after Obama's deal with them and their meticulous adherence to the treaty allowing 24-7-365 unfetterred access to the IAEA, it made no sense.

And even after Trump's unilateral abrogaton of the agreement, after the first few times he utterly destroyed their capacity to make a nuke, he should no longer have a right to keep utterly destroying their capacity to make a nuke.

It's like my Aunt Rosemarry used to say, "Fool me 17 times, shame on you; fool me 18 times, shame on you even more."

When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?