Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,168 posts
Cannonpointer » 02 Apr 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑
You are the one who ran a classic survivorship bias fallacy in the midst of his charge that you have no command of the concept - buttressing his position.
No, I didn't.
I have a sufficient command to
Call shenanigans on his original ****.
Define it in my own words
Call shenanigans on his "examples".
Eliminate all the incorrect options in his question.
Why have the two of you done, combined?