Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2026, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑
Recall all that jibber jabber **** about "Historical Context"?
Watch...
One of the sharpest exchanges came from Chief Justice John Roberts, who pushed back after Sauer suggested
the framers of the 14th Amendment could not have foreseen how “we’re in a new world now,” with billions of people “one plane ride away from having a child who’s a U.S. citizen.”
“It’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution,” Roberts replied.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/panicked- ... g-hearing/
Kind of hard to deny, though. That IS new.
No one was confused about the age of the Amendment.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?