Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Apr 2026, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

10 Apr 2026, 10:29 am

Huey » 09 Apr 2026, 5:02 am » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2026, 5:02 am

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2026, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2026, 7:38 pm

For what Grifty spent - in 5 weeks - incentivising the Iranians to put up a toll booth at Hormuz, we could have connected LA to San Francisco with the kind of rail service which litters China, Japan and Western Europe?

What, exactly, is your point?

what’s yours concerning this high speed rail debacle?


 

Deezer » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 1:43 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Apr 2026, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2026, 5:20 am

Coozie,

Why do you post so much stupid, indefensible, ****?

If you don't bother informing yourself, don't share.

Defend the rail system project. It's entirely democratic so you should know all the details.
Stay on topic.


 

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 1:48 am

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2026, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2026, 7:38 pm

What, exactly, is your point?

Look, I don't think we can hide from some liberal policies gone bad.  The corruption shyt is on both sides BV.



 

I made no reference to political parties...

I'm making a couple of simple points..

A) There is no substance to an argument consisting of Trigger Terms, like
"California....High Speed Rail.....Billions.....Eeeeek!". 

This is true regardless of how reliably it evokes the appropriate response among the credulous.


B) In the absence of substance, the most rational way to examine the question is by gauging Utility and Opportunity Cost...or Loss.

I mean Utility in the formal, academic, sense.


Does that clear up any confusion?