Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,168 posts
DeezerShoove » 23 Apr 2026, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑
Doesn't even look familiar. Besides, there's nothing remarkable about it.
Looks like your same old copy/paste **** so why would I treat it differently?
Good luck finding the "culprit".
T'weren't me from what I can tell but if I did, nobody thanked me.
btw
Not much of a loss. Take a breath and move on, Alice.
How about
"You were right....again...."
Looks like your same old copy/paste ****
That's what's called "evidence"...it is what you use to support an assertion.
This is basic ****, Coozie..