Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Is R "Eggplant" Suave laughing AT the retarded MAGATs...AGAIN??!?! (Part 47)
Today 12:27 am
Also let us consider these counterfactuals...which MAGATs are too retarded to consider (because their brains can't operate beyond a high school level of logic)
1) That the "LibrUL DemoCraP" scumbags like Newsom are corrupt and stole / laundered the money supposed to be allocated for homeless shelters, which says nothing about the feasibility of the policy itself
2) That homelessness is correlated with high COL (which happen to be strong libRuL / DemoCraP) strongholds due to their insistence on strict zoning laws - which, by the way, are some of the lowest priority targets of criticism of MAGATs
3) In the event the homeless were relocated from Oregon to...say, West Virginia, they would still be drug addicted dopes living in shanty shacks built 80 years ago...you've reduced the "homelessness" statistic but done nothing regarding the actual quality or standard of living which is presumably the purpose of the debate and not merely scoring brownie points
----------------------------
In some strange parallel universe, a MAGAT gets into office in SF, declares "Anyone who sleeps in a 5x5 ft or greater size tent is no longer considered 'homeless' " and hands out "free" tents to homeless...suddenly MAGATs would be stupefied!
1) That the "LibrUL DemoCraP" scumbags like Newsom are corrupt and stole / laundered the money supposed to be allocated for homeless shelters, which says nothing about the feasibility of the policy itself
2) That homelessness is correlated with high COL (which happen to be strong libRuL / DemoCraP) strongholds due to their insistence on strict zoning laws - which, by the way, are some of the lowest priority targets of criticism of MAGATs
3) In the event the homeless were relocated from Oregon to...say, West Virginia, they would still be drug addicted dopes living in shanty shacks built 80 years ago...you've reduced the "homelessness" statistic but done nothing regarding the actual quality or standard of living which is presumably the purpose of the debate and not merely scoring brownie points
----------------------------
In some strange parallel universe, a MAGAT gets into office in SF, declares "Anyone who sleeps in a 5x5 ft or greater size tent is no longer considered 'homeless' " and hands out "free" tents to homeless...suddenly MAGATs would be stupefied!