*Roshambo » Today, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑
Typical TRUMP loyalist, refers to a famous woman as a
BITCH. ZEETS2 Trump is not a "victim" HE WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE HE IS
You probably visited the men's room at Manhattan Bergdorf Goodman to engage in homosexual relations. Our winter residence is in Big Bay Michigan. We enjoy the tranquility of the UP, the snow, snowmobiling, and a host of other winter activities. Where we shop is no concern of yours.
Analyze the pattern
The FBI Interviews: The Department of Justice (DOJ) released summaries of four 2019 FBI interviews with an anonymous female victim. She alleged that Epstein transported her to New York/New Jersey at age 13 and introduced her to Trump, who she claims assaulted her in a tall building.
The Allegations: She alleged that Trump ordered everyone out of the room, forced her head to his penis, and struck her in the head when she bit him in self-defense.
ZEETS2 I carry my security on my hip, "Big Iron", Ruger Blackhawk 5.5" 44LC with "hot" SM Bear Load .45 Colt, 325gr Wide Flat Nose Gas Check ammo.
This will stop any two legged or four legged vermin, including a bear.
I DO believe he is a victim, just as anyone with a brain would when you have virtually NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER beyond the bogus claims of a gold-digger interested only in suing a wealthy businessman for millions!
If an alleged "victim" CAN'T identify the date, the time, or even the year of her claim, and doesn't have a single witness to an attack she claims was in the fitting room of one of the largest, most populated midtown Manhattan retail stores, which has an attendant at the doorway to the fitting room and security guards throughout the store she could have registered her complaint with, and then the corrupt DOJ of liberal NY totally ignores the statute of limitations on filing such a charge and insists that the trial venue remains in one of the most Trump-hating Democrat-run cities in the country for their jury pool, which didn't need a unanimous verdict but only a 4 person majority to convict him, along with the fact that she didn't make the claim for years afterward, knowing that the security cameras at the store would not retain those videos for so many years and would be unable to disprove her phony claim, then anyone with half a brain should be able to conclude how the fix was in to simply "get Trump" in the heavily biased "trial" against him. And the phony conviction is on appeal and very possibly will be overturned by the Supreme Court, which will no doubt break your little liberal heart!
And I think you're wise to pack a gun when you live in a shanty town of 265 people like Big Bay in a liberal state with a huge and growing Muslim population.
Needless to say, you're not nearly as familiar with witnessing the logistics of security in the kind of wealthy mid-Manhattan retail store on 5th Avenue as someone who has actually been to that Bergdorf Goodman store.