Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

You are disregarding the entire source of your citation.

You will have to try that again with the edit:

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off

My only "challenge" is to demonstrate the truth of what I've asserted.


I have done so. Unambigously. 

 

No, those questions cemented your loss.  You go off on tangents on **** you have no knowledge or experience with and you make a fool of yourself.

If you were with in arms length of me I would tell you to your face you are clueless about this.

You are argument is a weapon you ALLEGE was designed for combat but it was never issued for combat. That is **** stupid.  And I would say that within arms length as well.