Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

So? That is the crux of the matter.  You leave out the fact that I posted that the lower is a completely different design so it was not a weapon of war.

The only way you win this is if you answer those questions.  You won't because the answers will show you are wrong and lost

Stop citing yourself as an authority.

The only way you win this is 

By posting evidence in support of my assertion.

Done.

If there's another RULE, post it.
 

 

Actually, I am an authority, a SME on this topic.  Putting aside the fact I shot expert I was also a schooled trained armorer in the military.

You have done neither.

You lost.  Yo can not show that an alleged designed for war weapon, the colt shorter, was ever standard issue for combat or issues to infantry soldier as their personal weapon for combat.

Game over.  The moment you ran from the challenge your loss was apparent.