Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"Supreme Court Overrules Roe v. Wade in Dobbs Decision – Returns Abortion to State Lawmakers"
24 Jun 2022 1:36 pm
Now you are mixing constitutional opinions with personal opinions. Pick which one you want to discuss.Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑Again, being a **** sockpuppet, you evade the point.Huey » 24 Jun 2022, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ No, the context is at the state level. It could be popular vote by referendum OR like most states thru the direct representation of the people thru the STATE houses and Governor.
I don't think you understand how this country works.
This is a medical matter involving the only direct stakeholder and the advisor of her choice.
It is not a matter in which the State holds an interest. It lacks standing.
Your constitutional wanking is a pretext to restrict a woman's choice.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152