Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑Until you do, you should stop lying about mine.Huey » 24 Jun 2022, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ And I have yet to post my personal opinion of it.
But along the lines of your new argument they SCOTUS in 1973 reversed damn near TWO HUNDRED years of tradition and precedent.
Blackvegetable » 25 May 2022, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑No...you don't.Huey » 25 May 2022, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, I will acknowledge this but I have to ask.
Is your definition of "once" meaning you will never answer it again and no one can bring it up again? Or is your definition of once the same as when you asked me that question about combat and me my family, I answered telling you I would not discuss it again, yet for years you have continued bring it up?
When you answer the question I will honor the traditional definition of once. Not the blackvegetable definition of once.
Remember your rule.
As a matter of Principle, the idea that The State can force women to bear children is fundamentally objectionable.
Once you accept that fact, you are left with leaving any decision relating to her pregnancy to the woman so afflicted.
So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."
Acknowledge that my unambiguous stand is clear to you.
Don't offer me your talking points. I don't care.
Those are your words.So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."