WHY MR-7 LAUGHS AT THE 3RD PARTY VOTER Post #785337 • Liberal Forum

MR-7 » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 6:09 am
A candidate is legitimate because they

qualified for ballot access...met filing deadlines...submitted required signatures...formed a real campaign committee...met FEC requirements....and appeared on ballots nationwide. That’s legitimacy. Not a vibe. Not a theory. Not a manifesto. You’re demanding lectures about ‘legitimacy’ from a voting lane that has never even come close to winning anything. A 3rd‑party candidate hasn’t won a single state in over 50 years, and most of them can’t even win a county. You’re talking about a party that has never scored in modern political history.

Yes.

And you are incapable of seeing the reason for this is you.

MR-7 » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 6:09 am
A 3rd‑party candidate has not

won a presidential election
won a single state since 1968
come close to 270 electoral votes
held a competitive national lead

Nor will they, until your nuts drop.

MR-7 » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 6:09 am
The closest anyone got in the last half‑century

Ross Perot, 1992 — 19% popular vote, 0 states
Ross Perot, 1996 — 8%, 0 states
Gary Johnson, 2016 — 3%, 0 states

Get back to me when a 3rd party candidate can win even one "COUNTY" in an election. Just one "COUNTY".

In order for me to get back to you, I would have to know where you live.

You don't want that, you filthy ***.

When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?