Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Ego in a weak assed attempt to sugarcoat the failed conviction and award basis…

it’s a turd, brown, no matter how much you lick and polish it…

Ego in a weak assed attempt to sugarcoat the failed conviction and award basis…

it was a civil case. It pits a "Plaintiff" against a "Respondent"....the outcome is determined by a jury.

There's no "conviction" involved, and the judge can't "fail"...he can be reversed.

The Plaintiff prevailed. The award exceeded the "standard" by a factor of more than 5.

You're as **** stupid as @Beekeeper