Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:47 pm

Dudette, you really do not want to take that guy on concerning firearms.  ****, I can take you.  He will break you.

In the Moro Rebellion, the Tausug Moro Muslim juramentados in suicide attacks continued to charge against American soldiers even after being shot. Panglima Hassan in the Hassan uprising was shot dozens of times before he was killed; however, other accounts suggest that he survived and was cared for by his relative, Panglima Bandahala ibn Sattiya Munoh, a trusted adviser and close family member of the Sultan. As a result, Americans elected to phase out the .38 caliber Colt M1892 revolver in favor of .45 caliber sidearms to continue their fight against the Moros. This led to the issuance of the Military version of the Colt Model 1878 revolver, dubbed the 1878/1902 "Alaskan" (a collectors term only), chambered in .45 Long Colt, and later the issuance of the M1909 revolver, chambered in .45 Colt (which would later again be rechambered in the weaker .45 ACP as the M1917).[71] This contributed to the development and adoption of the .45 ACP M1911 semi-automatic pistol on March 29, 1911, after further weapon testing during the rebellion, beginning over 70 years of service by the pistol and cartridge in the US military.[72]

Not a hand cannon.  I provided you with examples of a hand cannon as did squatchman.  So you are saying he is wrong.

Oh, by the way, I have answered your questions.  You refuse to acknowledge that and you refuse to answer questions.  Now, perhaps, instead of demanding why one "needs" a particular firearm you can tell us what firearms you think we should own.

PS.  Using your logic you would have to ban the 9 mm