Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:32 am

it was a civil case. It pits a "Plaintiff" against a "Respondent"....the outcome is determined by a jury.

There's no "conviction" involved, and the judge can't "fail"...he can be reversed.

The Plaintiff prevailed. The award exceeded the "standard" by a factor of more than 5.

You're as **** stupid as @Beekeeper

so you’re clinging to “standard”?       

is it a legal guideline written into the annals of the halls of awards? NO! I can guarantee you the jury WAS NOT told what the “standard” was as it’s **** arbitrary…

that’s like the weather people whining or gloating about being above or below normal…WGAFF? where in the **** do you think they come from?       

GD your stupid hurts…