Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Did he feed israeli intelligence?
I don’t know...but what I do know is this: If you spend years running your **** mouth calling other people reckless with classified info, and then YOU end up pleading guilty to mishandling national defense material… that’s not foreign policy, that’s hypocrisy. 

If he DID, would you hold it against him?This isn’t about me, Israel, or TRUMP. This is about Bolton’s own actions catching up to him. If you preach national‑security purity for a decade and then get nailed for violating the same laws you lectured others about, that’s on YOU. So, no...I’m not playing your little ‘gotcha’ game. Bolton’s mess belongs to Bolton. Anyway, should someone else come forward and declare they are guilty, or a JURY finds them guilty, then once again, their mess belongs to them. But right now, that **** bolton is guilty.

Lol. THat second question should have been easy for you to answer. 

I notice it wasn't. It remains an open question. 

We certainly agree that no *** needed these charges shoved up it more than bolton's. That he will die a convicted felon is a veritable FOUNT of shadenfreude in Pointerville. 

But unlike you, I am greatly bothered when someone gets in trouble for a thing like mishandling intel and there is no mention of WHO PROFITED FROM THE BREACH. It's reminiscent of Gislane Maxwell pandering children to no one. It signals there is very likely a protected criminal in the mix, NOT being identified and punished. And I think that should bother you. 

We can applaud a rat being caught while still demanding that the job be finished, can we not?