Today 8:00 am
Slack Jaw, you’re confusing an investigative article with a legal ruling. Nothing in that report establishes an “illegal order,” and Kelly’s video wasn’t a prophecy...it was political messaging. You don’t get to declare military orders unlawful because Yahoo wrote a headline. Come back when you understand ROE, Title 10, and what actually qualifies as an unlawful order. U R so g'ddamn stupid.*Roshambo » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In late 2025, Senator Kelly (a retired Navy captain and former astronaut) and five other Democratic lawmakers published a video reminding military and intelligence personnel of their constitutional oath, stating they are obligated to refuse unlawful orders.
Well it looks like he was right. US boat strikes killed over 200 people. Service members have questions
The U.S. military has killed more than 200 people in strikes on boats in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific in the last nine months in what legal experts and former military lawyers broadly agree constitute illegal military orders that service members should refuse to follow.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/ ... 51006.html
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.