Guilty of what?
One wants to legalize pedophilia and institutionalize brutal misogyny.
The other made a plea deal that some people disagreed with. Most of the people trying to make hay over the plea deal are actively engaged in the pro-pedophile agenda, working to make it where NO ONE is ever charged again for raping babies.
Talarico OPENLY INSISTS that children have sexual agency. He votes that way. He makes speeches about it. His "advocacy" for tranny surgeries for children is a far cry more off-putting than a prosecutor taking a one-off bribe from a pedophile. And that's painting Paxton's behaviors in the worst possible light.
The truth is, the case Paxton pled out had already generated a nul verdict from a hung jury. The general tendency of cases that were hung is that they get hung again - and again. It gets easier for the defense and harder for the state with every new trial.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?