FOS » 25 Jun 2022, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Roe v Wade was based on a retarded **** crazy idea that the constitution defended abortion.
You can read the Constitution yourself. It doesn't say **** about abortion.
It's kinda funny that in a country founded by protestants, there was some culture of accepting the interpretation of 'experts' (priests) interpreting a text in stupidly imaginative ways.
I am not a lawyer and do not need to be. I can read the constitution. And roe v Wade is retarded.. whether it is the right thing or not...I don't care where you land on that....it's a stupid legal argument..
My father actually was a lawyer. A very successful one. And he agreed. Legally Roe v Wade was stupid. But he would only whisper that to me cause he was always on board with the leftist agenda.
From just a legal standpoint axiom? ha ha ha ha ha ha how one sided debates have always worked 24/7 life only exists mutually evolving here now among the reproductions left living forward now. Right?
Legal is separate from moral.
factual is separating actual results into intellectual categories of what else is possible as a species that become race, creed, color, national origin, gender, all he ideologies assumed as social identities.
Liberty to use your own brain navigating time mutually evolving now is forbidden in every reality defining typecast people saving humanity
Tyranny begins with power of suggesting real isn't real.
Reasonable doubt ends with extinction of the species believing they are exempt from mutually evolving here now.
What people do cradle to grave advancing ideology beyond their time evolving here now.