Today 10:40 am
You MUST be retarded to think that the US uses a proxy like Israel in the same way as Iran uses Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Say that in english, ***. You seem to have our positions mixed up.
You just ran your own retarded position.
MY position is that Hezbollah doesn't even know where Iran is on a map. There is absolutely no relationship.
Just like ISIL/ISIS/Al Qaeda and the USA/Israel.
No relationship.
They just sprung into existence and became functional without the assistance of a state security agency, just like Hezbollah.
The conversation where israel and the usa use proxies, same is iran. But I am all done changing your panties, young lady. You and the other conjob *** have managed to wear out my patience with the homosexual community.
Do either the US or Israel force Shari law or any other religion on others?
Do either stone women to death for being accused of indecency?
Do either behead those who refuse to convert to a particular religion?
Do either allow young girls to be raped or forced into marriage at the age of 9?
Do either murder gays (luckily for you) by throwing them off rooftops?
Get your empty head out of your ***, nitwit. There's sufficient overwhelming evidence proving Iran has been funding Hezbollah for years to convince even a blockhead like YOU of that fact!
So why can't you answer such a simple question, ***?Between Tehran and Beirut: Iran’s Growing Commitment to Hezbollah
Against the backdrop of the recent escalation, which culminated in Israel's strike on a Hezbollah stronghold: How the linkage between Tehran and the Shiite terrorist organization was reshaped in the wake of Operation "Roaring Lion"INSS Insight No. 2151, June 9, 2026
Raz Zimmt
Since the outbreak of Operation “Roaring Lion,” and even more so against the backdrop of the escalation in Lebanon in recent weeks, the perception emphasizing Hezbollah’s importance as a strategic component of Iran’s security doctrine has grown stronger in Tehran. Hezbollah’s decision to join the campaign alongside Iran was perceived in Tehran as an expression of its commitment to the pro-Iranian axis in the region and of the continued relevance of Iran’s proxy strategy—which appeared to be eroding following the weakening of the Axis and the reluctance of Iran’s allies, including Hezbollah, to join the campaign in June 2025. Iran’s commitment to Hezbollah has been reflected in its insistence on binding any permanent ceasefire agreement with the United States to a ceasefire in Lebanon. This commitment reached its peak in Iran’s strikes against Israel on June 7, following Israeli attacks in Beirut. Nevertheless, Iran continues to face significant challenges in implementing its proxy concept in the post-war period. These include the continuation of Israeli operations against Hezbollah; Israeli-Lebanese negotiations; growing criticism of Hezbollah and Iran within Lebanon; and worsening economic constraints inside Iran. Despite these challenges, it appears that, at this stage, the linkage between Iran and Hezbollah cannot be severed, partly due to the lack of any viable alternative to Iranian support for the organization.
Why would Iran insist that the current cease fire include no further Israeli attacks on Hezbollah and risk further renewed attacks on themselves by both the US and Israel if they were NOT a key proxy they wish to maintain?
But PLEASE, continue spouting your own stupidity! Don't EVER be ashamed of your incredible ignorance!
We wouldn't recognize you any other way without a dick in your mouth!