Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Is it more harmful to have a third party run when it makes democracy mathematically impossible?
Today 6:57 am
That 4 year term was MEANT to have a level of "instability" to FORCE CHANGE of leadership so that NO ONE PERSON OR PARTY would become powerful enough to overthrow the entire scheme, *******!!Vegas » Yesterday, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ True. Did you know that back in the 1870s and early 1880s, the government was seriously considering making the presidency a one time 7 year term? That is still temporary, but at least there would be a sense of stability. 4 year terms feels like we work in a workplace with a high turnover rate among the management.
Same for House seats at 2 years and Senate for 6 year terms.
But your **** belief that somehow "Democracy" is so **** great and is what the US of A has is WILDLY COMMUNIST IN THOUGHT., cupcake!!
WE ARE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLICAN CONFEDERATION OF STATES. PERIOD. NO DEMOCRACY ANYTHING. In a DEMOCRACY, the RIGHTS OF THE MINORITY ARE DISMISSED, REMOVED, and those who disagree are EXTERMINATED.
Now, SHUT THE **** UP about **** you know ZERO ABOUT, COMMIE ASSHOLE!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.