Is it more harmful to have a third party run when it makes democracy mathematically impossible? Post #793330 • Liberal Forum

Beekeeper » Today, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 6:57 am
That 4 year term was MEANT to have a level of "instability" to FORCE CHANGE of leadership so that NO ONE PERSON OR PARTY would become powerful enough to overthrow the entire scheme, *******!!

Same for House seats at 2 years and Senate for 6 year terms.

But your **** belief that somehow "Democracy" is so **** great and is what the US of A has is WILDLY COMMUNIST IN THOUGHT., cupcake!!

WE ARE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLICAN CONFEDERATION OF STATES. PERIOD. NO DEMOCRACY ANYTHING. In a DEMOCRACY, the RIGHTS OF THE MINORITY ARE DISMISSED, REMOVED, and those who disagree are EXTERMINATED.

Now, SHUT THE **** UP about **** you know ZERO ABOUT, COMMIE ASSHOLE!!

I didn't expect you to understand the math in the OP, so don't worry. I expected an ignorant reply from you.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...