Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Is it more harmful to have a third party run when it makes democracy mathematically impossible?
Yesterday 12:22 pm
Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You idiot. Why do I have to dumb **** down for you? Focus: Regardless if we are a Republic, Democracy, or any other system that is rooted in voting, it is mathematically impossible for the mass of people to be represented if a third party is on the ballet. Period.
Math does not give a **** about government structure, the constitution, your opinion, or my opinion.
God man. I hate getting the crayons out. It's exhausting. It's like talking to BV. I have to dumb things down for him also.
Get your crayons out, CUPCAKE!!
It fits your IQ to a tee!!
NO ONE GIVES 2 **** WHAT YOU THINK!! THAT seems to be the part you're missing here. YOUR PREMISE IS FLAWED!! NO WHERE does our CONSTITUTION SAY that we have to "Represent the majority" of any group of people. IT SAYS, WE PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THE MINORITY and NOT BOW DOWN TO THE WHIMS OF THE MAJORITY, ****!!
ARE YOU THAT **** STUPID?? Oh, never mind, you are.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.