Liberal Forum

jerrab » Today, 12:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:11 am

not the ones in Syria who were only fighting and defeating isis, the group who were going around beheading people

IF the ones in Syria really WERE fighting ISIS, then they needed to die. 

We WON in Syria, you know. You get that, right? That we won? You UNDERSTAND that the Russians lost, the yanks won, and Bashar al Assad was deposed, yes? He fled the country and was replaced by the "moderate" rebels - yeah?

I just want us on the same page for the big reveal. We won. The Russians lost. Regime change occurred.

Today, the fine gentleman running Syria is Ahmed al-Sharaa. He was the head of the al-Qaeda-affiliated group Jabhat al-Nusra forces fighting WITH THE AMERICANS TO TOPPLE AL ASSAD. Before that, he fought alongside ISIS in Iraq. Trump hails him as a fine fellow - even hosted him at the white house.

So here is the problem. We have an intelligent fellow who understands what the **** is happening over there, trying to explain the kurdish problem to someone who doesn't even comprehend that ISIS (like a dozen of its doppelgangers) is a US proxy created, funded, trained, supplied, and assisted by the United States government to produce the results we are interested in. Just try to explain to yourself why ISIS has never moved against Israel - or why both Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post reported that the IDF was triaging and rearming ISIS fighters who were wounded by Syrian government forces.

So if the Kurds really WERE attacking ISIS as you have been instructed to believe, then they DOUBLE-DOG needed killing - if not by the Turks than by the US forces in the area.