User avatar
golfboy
Yesterday 8:59 pm
User avatar
     
4,440 posts
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:50 pm » wrote: "Enrichment and OTHER MUTUALLY AGREED MATTERS."

Enrichment is already mutually agreed.

Remember, these people are communicating in english, not slackjaw. 

As far as legitimate uses for enriched uranium, here is what AI said:

Enriched uranium has had the proportion of its fissile isotope, Uranium-235 (U-235), increased through an isotope separation process. It serves primarily as the energy source for civilian nuclear power, as fuel for naval propulsion, and as material for medical research and diagnostics.

As for Iran's decisions about generating power, I'm not enough of a control freak to generate an opinion about how they should manage that. Since they have oil, should the not use wind, solar, or hydro, as well, in Controlandia?
Same old Cannon taking pieces of statements and misrepresenting them.
It does not say "Enrichment" as though that is agreed upon, it says "the issue of enrichment". We say this issue is settled and they don't NEED to enrich because we'll provide the nuclear fuel they need for civilian power.
 
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search