Huey » Today, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑
Dman, your own sources keep **** you over:
The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law
Another one bites the dust.
That is not cherry picked.. THAT is a real fact that YOU refuse to acknowledge, Puss. Keep spinning PUSS.
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
If you want to opine on the matter, you do..
You aren't free to cherrypick items for your alternative take.
Remember, I can read this stuff...you don't even try.
Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » Today, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑
RebelGator » Today, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑
No, he pretty much informed everyone in court that the harlot was violated, even though:
E. Jean Carroll could not remember four specific time-related details regarding the alleged mid-1990s assault:
- The exact date
- The month
- The season
- The exact year (she initially fluctuated between 1994 and 1995 before landing on 1996
The poor thing was so traumatized by the violations, she kept getting the 1/2 dozen rapes she had to endure, all mixed up with one another.
Yes, we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.
Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » Today, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑
Yes, we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.
we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.
"We" need to do some reading
No, we don't need to do anymore. WE all know what the boxed checked NO on the Verdict Form means. You are so ****** like you are afraid to admit you are wrong.
GTFO of my face with your weak spin, PUSS.