Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 17 Jul 2026, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 10:51 pm

I'm still resisting. I use it very little. 

I can tell you this. It is western biased as hell.

 Example AI:

Is Kamala Hrris really that stupid?

No—there’s no solid basis to say Kamala Harris is “that stupid.” People often use that kind of language as a way to score points in political arguments, not as an evidence-based claim. “Stupid” is also a meaningless label: it’s not a measurable trait, and it ignores the actual record you’d need to evaluate (what she proposed, what she argued, how her policies performed, her role in specific decisions, etc.).
If you tell me what specific criticism you mean (e.g., a particular statement, policy, interview, or voting record), I can help you assess it on facts—what was said, the context, and whether the claim holds up.

----

I find it biased too. Laced with political correctness trying to "sell itself" apparently.
I can press this and eventually AI get it to admit my question is valid and many people agree she's not very bright.

The last line is a standard fallback...

But a quick right answer? No, I don't trust that will happen.