Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Start a thread, get some originality and explain why law abiding citizens should be barred from owning semi automatic rifles that look mean and scary and function no different than one that doesn't.

Sheilagh,

Take it up with your own citation(s).


My point stands....

@Vegas  is even more ignorant than you.

And that's a distinction 

 

 

You didn't make a point.  An assault is LEGALLY defined as a SEMI AUTOMATIC with certain visual, eternal cosmetic pieces:


AI OverviewAn "assault weapon" is a legal term, not a technical one. It typically refers to semi-automatic firearms—which fire one bullet per trigger pull—equipped with specific military-style, cosmetic features, such as detachable magazines, pistol grips, or folding stocks

Also, the LEGAL TERM assualt rifle, as I have taught you before, differs from state to state.  So please post what state you are referring to

Go ahead and why why law abiding citizens should be barred from owning semi automatic rifles that look mean and scary and function no different than one that doesn't.

You saying something about words and numbers. On this topic that appears to be YOU problem, Melty.  Constangly knocking your dick in the dirt is getting boring.