Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

If the facts were verified by those citations I provided you years ago you would have answered the questions 

The facts aren't subject to your arbitrary demands. 

 

Run, Puss, run.  @Cannonpointer  if the Puss BV shows the AR 15 SPORTER in the military list and the date range the Sporter was standard combat issue from the sources he is using shut off my account for a month.

Doesn't get any better than that, BV.

Consider yourself severely curb stomped.

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

The facts make the case...not your yapping 
 



 

Actually, no, the facts represented by those questions say you are liar.  Or a *******.

Huey » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

55 minutes ago

If that is the case you should have no problem beating me with it by answering the below questions using the info I gave you and claim to beat me with.

Or you can lie, spin and run.  Your call, Running Man.


 



 

Keep running, Puss.  If what you post is correct you would answer the questions and get rid of me for a month.

 


 

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Actually, no, the facts represented by those questions 

No..

The facts, verified by citations 

 


 

If the facts were verified by those citations I provided you years ago you would have answered the questions by now and I would take a month off if the Sporter was on the military list AND you posted the dates it was standard issue for use in combat.

But you haven't.  Keep running puss.

Why can I have the top rifle but not the bottom?