30 Jul 2026 7:20 am
LMAO - the number of assumptions upon which that modeling is based makes the math wacky tacky.*Roshambo » Today, 1:31 am » wrote: ↑ Mathematical modeling comparing actual outcomes against a hypothetical scenario of no vaccination confirms that broad coverage significantly reduced population-level mortality rates. In summary, there will be interpretation, and leading experts are making the conclusion. It sounds like a HE said She said situation.
I am sticking to the the "saved lives" ,as we certainly could have had a lot more dead people. COVID‐19 vaccines appear to be very effective.
It's really about the inhale and exhale. You can take a lesson, here: https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses ... masks.html
I have absolutely no doubt you continue to rely on the experts' climate models, fruity pebbles.
Talk to us about sea level rise - use your experts.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?