28 Jun 2022 4:19 pm
Lol what do you mean or not.impartialobserver » 28 Jun 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Or not. In our case, my guess is that they think that men will be tow the party line better. The relatively lower pay in the public sector typically keeps the most talented folks away. My private sector counterparts in NV earn between $35,000 and $50,000 more than myself.
Think of how many great men there were in history compared to great women.
It's like a 100:1 ratio lol..
And again...as I already pointed out...because feminism is so psycho today it actually is harmful politically to hire men men high profile stuff. Your suggestion is clearly the opposite of the truth.
No company would ever get in trouble for hiring too many women...or too many blacks...or too many homosexuals. That would never happen.
But companies absolutely will get in trouble for not hiring enough of them.
So how on earth does your speculation make any sense?