28 Jun 2022 4:28 pm
I am not sure why I think that you are worth my time. However, I digress. You clearly skipped over a certain element in my second post...FOS » 28 Jun 2022, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol what do you mean or not.
Think of how many great men there were in history compared to great women.
It's like a 100:1 ratio lol..
And again...as I already pointed out...because feminism is so psycho today it actually is harmful politically to hire men men high profile stuff. Your suggestion is clearly the opposite of the truth.
No company would ever get in trouble for hiring too many women...or too many blacks...or too many homosexuals. That would never happen.
But companies absolutely will get in trouble for not hiring enough of them.
So how on earth does your speculation make any sense?
"prior to this newest governor"
Yes, the newest governor has definitely went the other way hiring/appointing women. I am referring to times before him... in other words before 2019. Before him, there was an obvious bias towards males. Have the women hired by the newest governor done better? That is a matter of opinion being that one can't really measure their performance like you can with a coach (wins and losses) or CEO (profit or loss). A lot of them were put in no-win situations. State got shut down and afterwards, the demands on their respective depts increased greatly but their budgets/staff shrank.