Today 5:21 am
So **** g'ddammned stupidHuey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ All you are doing is proving Pirro isn’t a Trump Stooge.
Keep up the good work.
After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence over the past few weeks, Ms. Pirro determined the Hearn indictment needed to be rescinded before it was thrown out of court, according to two people close to the situation.
Her critics have questioned whether her motive was nearly so straightforward or altruistic.
They suggest that Ms. Pirro’s decision to withdraw the indictment was self-protective: She might be trying to head off disciplinary action that could result if grand jury testimony or other internal materials are made public. Mr. Hearn’s lawyers said she was guilty of what she had accused Mr. Burgum of doing — rushing to take an action to appease her boss — and that she had ample access, before indicting Mr. Hearn, to evidence showing that the damage had been caused by the contractor.