*Roshambo » Today, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑
He posted that he patronized a sex worker and for all I know it could have been a man in a dress.
Surely one visit costs more than that silly ring that doubles as his “you know what” Ring
I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.
And I told you, that is not the original ring. that is in a safe somewhere. Many people wear those silicon rings as well as understanding a reflection in a mirror is reversed.
But hey, keep 'em coming. This is too easy for me