Vegas » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
None. There has never been a US president in our history without inserting our military into some kind of action around the world.
How come we can't have a strong military for defense only? I am good with having a formidable military..for defense only. The two are mutually exclusive. It is very possible to have unparalleled military might and peace at the same time.
Remember how fierce-sounding "battle hardened troops" is . . .
How can we practice and rotate munitions stock without a playground?
Defense only . . .

Are you crazy?
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.