Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,746 posts
Beekeeper » Today, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑
Want a REASON WHY we often need to be the first to attack??
Dec.7th, 1941. Pearl Harbor, HI.
WE as a nation were in an ISOLATIONIST POSTURE and lost bigly for nearly a year. WE only had ~600,000 men in uniform at that time. Had the BATTLE OF MIDWAY been a success by the Japanese, there is a good chance we would have capitulated to their demands and lost the war totally.
Be a **** IDIOT if you want, but taking the lead often means taking it to your enemy first, MORON!!
Well, I don't know. Maybe if we would stop **** with other countries by putting them into poverty, so we can exploit their resources, they may not need a reason to attack us.
Just a thought.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...