Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Nope.
"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
- Joseph Story,
Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833
Just curious....was Burger ever able to explain why there was no FEDERAL Firearm Laws from 1791 2when the Bill of Rights was ratified until the NFA of 1934, 143 years?
Thoroughly debunked.
Bruen was given to Thomas because no one else wanted to be associated with writing it.
He's already been humiliated once...
Just curious....was Burger ever able to explain why there was no FEDERAL Firearm Laws from 1791 2when the Bill of Rights was ratified until the NFA of 1934, 143 years?
You replied to the wrong post. Try again.
But to end your opinion do not forget this:
AI OverviewIn the 2022 Supreme Court case
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Court ruled 6-3 that individuals have a constitutional right to carry handguns in public for self-defense
Back to the quotes:I do not carry a pistol so I can impose my will on someone else. I carry a pistol so someone else cannot impose their will on me! - Lynn Givens, Rangemaster