Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 29 Jun 2022, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 9:45 am

****!  "First hand account" would have required HER to be IN THE VEHICLE in order to witness the **** she was told to say, AND SHE WASN'T THERE!
All that being "under oath" means is that she's telling the truth that someone told her lies that the Secret Service has denied as being true, and you gullible morons swallow it like your daily quiche!

Are you such a dickhead that you don't even realize that HEARSAY EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE in a real court?  Are you so dumb that you don't realize if they had anything better than inadmissible evidence, THEY WOULD HAVE USED IT?  All that phony testimony reveals is just how fake this entire Hollywood production really is, AND HOW GULLIBLE THOSE DEMOCRAT LIARS BELIEVE YOU ARE!

Where's Pelosi's testimony?  Where's Bowser's?  Where is the testimony from the Capitol guards who opened the doors and ushered the demonstrators inside?
Where is the testimony from Ray Epps, and why hasn't he been issued a subpoena to appear?  Why hasn't the head of the FBI testifying as to why, who, and how many FBI agents were inserted into the Jan. 6th crowd who have been proven to have incited the riot?

Let's see you answer those questions without your usual distractions, eggplant!
Not that you'd have the balls to do so!

She made quite clear that this was something she was told in a conversation with 2 other parties.

But the bulk of her testimony involved recounting what she saw or heard in the WH on Jan 6th.