18 Aug 2026 10:10 am
Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ This is nonsense.
The "civilian" AR-15 is a variant of the original AR-15 design, modified so as not to be a machine gun subject to the 1934 regs.
It doesn't "look" like an assault rifle...it is one.
This terminology debate is irrelevant. The AR-15's design and development predates the etymological discussion. The antecedent is German.
You have citations for that as well as a citation, one you have had for years, that shows the multiple designs. Even the ATF recognizes the different designs.It doesn't "look" like an assault rifle...it is one.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152