18 Aug 2026 2:04 pm
It is not a question of if a sporter could have been converted. It is a question if it could be readily converted.Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't say that.
More wasted bandwidth because you lie.
digest.php?u=1971&t=103339&start=80Blackvegetable
Huey » Today, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 10:05 am
Not READILY. Remember, words have meaning. But that's not at issue.
It COULD be converted because doing so only requires modification, being that the two weapons share 90% of parts...
No diversion.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152