Cannonpointer » Today, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑
When I took reagan's and carter's stats side by side with my own analysis, he was entirely incapable of disputing a word of it. It literally ran him off the board in humiliation.
His first critique was a fallacy from authority, insisting that I present NOT my own opinion, but the opinions of "respected sources." He had no idea that relying on others for one's arguments is effeminate.
He ran like a scalded dog. That was a good time, good time.
He claimed that CARTER was to blame for Reagan's lackluster "stats" at the beginning of his term.
Because that's all the economy boils down to...a bunch of numbers some installed bureaucrat can manipulate or lie about at the ownership clique's discretion...